Friday, December 05, 2008
Fast Times at Ilion High (Revisited)
The post (which I deleted yesterday) took issue with the plans organizers had laid out for our 10 year high school reunion. I was living in Irvine, CA at the time and Michelle was expecting our second child. My circumstances were such that I was not going to be able to attend the reunion, though I still felt stirrings to try to do so to reconnect. However, after learning about the format for the reunion -- the major event of which was a catered BBQ at a classmates' home -- I responded critically on this blog.
In what amounted to only a small part of my foolishness, I took no account for how my comments were likely to affect those with a vested interest in the reunion [i.e., the organizers]. Nope, in my small-mindedness I had not considered that my public posting, with a search involving a few key words in the post, would reach far beyond my family and a few of my friends.
I learned for the first time yesterday that those comments posted long ago did get back to many involved in the reunion plans, and that several of them responded in kind on the blog [which I also had not seen until visiting yesterday]. One of the less profane, yet biting comments from a former classmate referred to me as a "pretentious, egotistical jerk."
What has stung is that such criticism of me seems justifiable.
I do not know to what extent this belated apology will ever reach those whom I foolishly offended now years ago. Nor am I confident that those people would even care at this point. But for what's it worth, I am very sorry. The post and criticism were uncalled for. This apology has been delayed only because it was not until yesterday that my foolishness was brought to my attention.
While I may not have been mature enough then to recognize that the value of a reunion lies more in the chance to reconnect than in the venue or format, I recognize that now. My ill-advised comments revealed my own shortcomings far more than any shortcomings in the efforts of those who organized the reunion.
Again, I am very sorry.
Aaron
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Survival Instincts and Triple Chocolate Brownies
The baby lives only to eat and sleep, and generally is discontented when she's not doing either. Mommy lives only to feed and sleep, and usually has to find a way to still be functional when she's forced to do without the latter. Daddy exists only to serve, and whenever Mommy senses he's branched beyond servitude and is attempting to pursue other pleasures,* she threatens imminent bodily harm [if only with her eyes and tone of voice]. The other children exist only to thwart the others' survival efforts, either by smothering the little one or making sure that they're loud and rambunctuous enough that neither she nor Mommy ever sleeps [and that Daddy suffers the wrath for not having kept them from being loud and rambunctuous].
Every evenings is a potential marathon fraught with "the baby isn't sleeping" time or "the baby is sleeping, but she might not be soon" time. It's a bleak existence, and I cling only to the cuteness of our little one, the sweets we've got in the cupboard or freezer, and the hope that things will settle in to a manageable routine at some point in the near future.**
All this is to say that celebrating Michelle's birthday yesterday proved a bit more difficult than in previous years.
In place of a birthday cake [which she's no longer shy about claiming not to like], she asked for birthday brownies: good ones. I turned to the only place I could trust with such a perilous assignment: Costco. As it happened, they were still selling the 7 lb. Ghiradelli Triple Chocolate Brownie Mix, which I don't think we've had since our days in Cambridge.
Demonstrating that Michelle's culinary wiles are not entirely lost on me, I decided not only to add walnuts to the mix, but to toast the walnuts before adding them. I also cooked them hours ahead of time to ensure that they'd be sufficiently cooled when the time came to eat them.***
[The baking team]
The result was a triple chocolate triumph.
For dinner, we went with a cheese pizza from what we've found to be San Diego's best pizzeria: Bronx Pizza. It's good, though when you've had the best at Grimaldi's in Brooklyn, it's hard to be impressed. Indeed as we ate our Bronx cheese pizza, I mused that this pizza of pizza's here in San Diego is little more than a slightly inferior version of what I grew up eating at Sorrento's Pizza in small town Ilion, NY. How odd it seemed that pizza out of a town of 10,000 comparatively in the middle of nowhere Upstate New York could so easily match, if not outclass, the best San Diego, California -- with it's 1.3 million people -- has to offer. [I also got a $5 Little Caesar's pepperoni pizza for the kids, since slices of the the Bronx pepperoni pizza come at a hefty $2.50 a pop and my kids would not have appreciated the difference.]
Additionally, I'm not sure I'm sold on the Ghirardelli brownies/Breyer's vanilla ice cream combo. The brownies are great, and the ice cream, of course, is great, and I would wholeheartedly recommend either as a stand alone dessert [provided you have some milk with the brownies.] But I didn't sense that they complimented each other well. Instead, it was as though these two dessert heavyweights were battling each other for tastebud supremacy and, because of the battle, ultimately cancelled out the delightful nuances that make them each stand out in their own right. [Granted, though, the pleasure of the Ghirardelli brownies isn't so much nuance as it is a chocolate assault on the senses.] I'm wondering if it's not a wasted effort coupling a really great brownie with a really great vanilla ice cream. Instead, the best course may be to decide which should be the "lead" dessert on any given evening, and then look for a mediocre compliment.
In any event, Michelle still turned 29 and seemed to appreciate the efforts to make special what surely was one of her more subdued birthday celebrations. Natalie would later make for a long evening, which Michelle bore with more patience than I was capable of. [Natalie may have been ticked we shared neither the pizza nor the dessert with her.]
Happy Birthday Love!
*Like blogging, for instance.
** Depending on the hour of the day, I may or may not be just kidding.
*** As some of you may be aware, unlike some other baked goods (cinammon rolls, apple crisp, and chocolate chip cookies, for instance) brownies are almost never better warm than they are cooled. The heat can easily mask the subtlety of the chocolate flavor that makes a good brownie so enjoyable. It also diminishes the appropriately famous brownie/vanilla ice cream combo by melting the vanilla ice cream, which is not desired for this particular dessert combo.
Thursday, October 02, 2008
Fatherhood -- Part 3
[Natalie Elizabeth Clark]
9:45 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.: Many tears are shed [and not the joyous kind], and I can't help feeling that somehow they're all my fault.
2 a.m. ish: Michelle is awoken by an apparent street race, complete screeching tires, roaring engines, and a sprinkle of sirens and helicopter coverage. From her report, the race seemed to involve at least a couple of laps down Friars Road. This keeps her awake long after the chase has ended. I, of course, sleep through it all.*
4 a.m. ish: I notice the living room light is on and Michelle is not in bed. This means she is not sleeping. Not a good sign of things to come.
6:30 a.m.: Jared is awaking and dancing [literally] around the house. He is excited at the prospect of a new baby sister coming today. This, and the fact that we have blueberries for breakfast.
7:30 a.m.: We drop off the kids [still dancing] with friends and head to the hospital.
8:05 a.m.: We're five minutes late. I'm scheming over whether I need to buy the $20 parking pass or whether I can chance paying less by posing as a patient. I'm also wondering whether my flexible spending account will only cover the mileage for the the initial trip to the hospital, or each subsequent trip.
9:10 a.m.: The IV is in. Knowing Michelle, the hardest part of the whole ordeal is now over. [And she says this very thing moments later.]
9:20 a.m.: I float the idea of watching the White Sox/Twins play-in game later in the day. This is met with the kind of laughter from both the nurse and Michelle that tells me they don't think I'm serious.
10:51 a.m.: Michelle wants to be sure we've chosen the right name for our little girl. I openly wonder if it's too late to throw the name "Mad Mountain Dean" into the mix. This gets a laugh out of Michelle, which is a good sign.
Noon: I am famished. Michelle is too (though she's not allowed to eat). I head out for lunch and face the dilemma of where to eat. There are a few Mexican restaurants within walking distance, a CVS drugstore/pharmacy, and a Daphne's [Greek fast food.] Those factors weighing on my decision are: (1) I have $10 cash; (2) I need at least $3 cash for parking; and (3) I want to get full but not comatose full. I opt to start at CVS to see if anything strikes my fancy. A $2 14 oz. bag of Peanut M&M's catches my eye, but I just say no [bearing in mind that latter element to factor #3]. In the end, I opt for the Mexican restaurant closest to the hospital, since they take take American Express [meaning 3% back], and offer a sizeable California Burrito. They also have a salsa bar, so I'm sensing I made the right decision.
12:30 p.m.: Back in the delivery room, I find that my California Burrito doesn't have any of the promised potatoes inside. Even if it's a decent carne asada burrito otherwise (which it is) it's still not what I purchased. I weigh my options about returning to complain, but other matters seem a little more pressing.
12:38 p.m.: Michelle gets an epidural, and I wait out in the hall. I take my laptop with me and sit in a chair that seems conveniently positioned right outside the delivery room. I then start plugging away and some old journal entries I'm transcribing, when a nurse comes by and tells me to turn off the laptop. I find this odd [since it's allowed in the delivery room], but obediently comply. A few minutes later, I hear the nurse whisper to Michelle's doctor, who then approaches me and kicks me out of the hallway entirely, since my positioning in the hallway may infringe on other patients' rights to confidentiality. I'm a bit disgruntled about the way this was handled, but, not wanting to watch doctors stick long needles into Michelle's spine, I opting for the waiting room, where "Real Housewives of Orange County" is playing on the TV. I can't seem to avert my eyes from the show for more than a few moments.
3 p.m. ish: Michelle is only dilated to 4 cm. Ugh.
4 p.m.: I call our friends watching Jared and Emily, noting that things may go far later than we expected this evening.
4:45 p.m.: Still no baby, though Michelle is letting me watch the White Sox and Twins. [Of course, if it hadn't been for the epidural, I wouldn't have even been able to read without annoying her, so we're both feeling fortunate.]
5:20 p.m.: 10 cm. That was fast.
5:33 p.m.: Lots of hair, and a purple little body. The cord had to be untangled a bit. In those first few moments outside the womb, I find I'm holding my breath waiting to see if Natalie will take hers. In this instant I realize just how foolishly I had taken for granted the prospective health and well being of this little girl [and Michelle's as well, for that matter.] But she does breathe, and offers a faint little newborn cry that I count among the most pleasant sounds in all the world. As I hear it, I thank God for His mercy in looking past just how lightly I had looked upon the need for His help and protection in this endeavor.
6:15 p.m.: I reluctantly start phoning family members to share the good news. These are the kinds of things I much prefer to delegate to Michelle, though I can't quite bring myself to ask her at the moment. Natalie seems to be a bit more placid than I remember her siblings being.
10:15 p.m.: With Jared and Emily sleepingly soundly, I ready for bed myself. The house seems empty, but I still remember to wipe off the bathroom mirror, somehow thinking Michelle will be able to sense it and be pleased.
Wednesday 10/1/08
6:30 a.m.: Jared comes bounding into my bedroom, wondering where Mommy is. He answers his own questioning a few moments later, remembering she just had a baby yesterday. Emily announces from her crib, "I want to wake up!" and the morning begins.
9:45 a.m.: We drop off three dozen celebratory donuts at the office. Jared complains that this only leaves our family with one dozen. [He then notes that he was hoping for at least 2 dozen.]
10:35 a.m.: We greet Natalie and Michelle with a dozen Krispy Kreme donuts and some chocolate milk. Few happier moments have ever been known among the Clarks [or likely among anyone for that matter.]
[Oh yes, the kids also got to watch "Dora the Explorer" the perfect compliment to donuts, chocolate milk, and a new baby sister.]
10/2/08
1:30 p.m.: Natalie and Michelle come home amid moderate fanfare [mostly requests by Jared and Emily to "pet the baby." Now the real fun begins.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
I'm Back
Anyone who has followed this blog for longer than the last 13 months is probably already familiar with some of my background in this area:
When I got married nearly nine years ago, I was at or below about 225 lbs. [Such were the delightful days of never having to pay attention to the scale.] This is roughly what I weighed during the halcyon days of high school and college basketball.
Three years later, by the time I started law school, I had ballooned to about 310 lbs. Indeed, I remember distinctly a sister of mine playfully referred to me as "tubby," which nickname was not so playfully received. While it still seems an odd thing that I, or anyone, could simply "let themselves go" that much, my efforts to reverse course could never quite overcome the allure of an evening half gallon of ice cream or a lunch time package of Oreos.
It was with the onset of winter 2002 (and first semester, 1st year law school exams) that I began making headway. There were lots of bitterly cold mornings where I ran around the Charles River (in Cambridge), and occassionally even exercised a modicum of eating control.
As my posts -- especially my earlier posts -- have documented, it has been anything but a direct path since then. Little by little, however, my habits seem to have steadily improved. My motivation in recent years has been in attaining the "Preferred Select" class of life insurance -- the top class that garners the cheapest rates.
Last year I narrowly missed for a few reasons: (1) the nurse doing the physical measured me at 6' 6" -- and refused to budge on that measurement -- which lowered my weight class [in other words, I had to weigh less at 6' 6" for the preferred select class than I would have at 6' 7"]; (2) though I was near the top of the weight range [around 240 lbs.] I'd lost more than 10 lbs. in the preceding 12 months to get there, which apparently is a ding on your application.
Hence, to achieve that level of nirvana, I had to maintain my weight for a year and then reapply. Largely out of fear that I may have gained weight [especially after a particularly egregious Christmas season], I didn't weigh myself at all in the intervening months, until about 3 weeks ago.
This week -- 13 months after my last life insurance physical -- I had another. Not only did the nurse this time measure me at 6' 7", she then added another inch putting me at 6' 8" because I was barefoot (and she said they expect a measurement with shoes on). I then weighed in at 222 lbs, hopefully securing for the next 29 years the "preferred select" premium for life insurance coverage.
The days since that physical have felt odd. For all intents and purposes, I'm back to where I was nine years. For the first time in a long time, I have no real reason (or need) to diet, and no particular goal pushing me out the door to go running in the morning (besides maintaining, and perhaps balancing out the treats I intend to eat later in the day/week).
The truth seems to be that I've spent so much time striving to get here that I almost don't know what to do with myself now [though if you're in the area in the next 20 minutes, you'll probably catch me plodding up a nearby hill and later even running past a local donut shop.
It does feel good to be back.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Hiatus
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
A Tale of Two Donut Shops
We dutifully ate dinner that evening, and then cleared the table to make way for these donuts. With seven of us seat around the table, we took turns selecting donuts to sample, cutting the donuts into eighth's, and then sampling and offering commentary. It made for quality family time.
Sunday, June 29, 2008
A Disappointment of Cosmic Proportions
Last Saturday, I made the 30 mile round trip to Stardust Donuts in Imperial Beach. In tow was my little brother Peter, and also Jared & Emily. The trip brought with it high hopes and expectations, since Stardust Donuts has garnered local notoriety as the top spot for pastries.
Stardust Donuts is owned by two brothers. To hear tell, their quirkiness and approach to donuts rivals the Soup Nazi's approach to soup: they suffer for their donuts. They demand perfection from themselves and from their donuts. Why should they expect any less of their customers? In that vein, they open the shop when they feel like it, make the donuts they feel like making, and close it when all of the donuts and cinammon rolls sell out.
Sunday, June 15, 2008
A New Hope [For San Diego Donuts]
Help?
There doesn't seem to be anything moderate, though, about the array of sweets pictured above.
Friday, June 06, 2008
Happy National Donut Day!
If you're looking for recommendations on that one free donut, go with the glazed chocolate cake donut, the glazed blueberry, or the glazed sour cream. This, of course, assumes you're looking past their original glazed donuts, which are also worthy of your attention.
Happy Donut Day!
Saturday, May 31, 2008
Throw Down
Those familiar with this blog know that I've long held myself as the Dr. Mario World Champion. This latest iteration gives me the chance to prove it.
Since downloading the game this morning, I've hardly been able to stay away from it. The online feature has me hopelessly addicted, especially as I ascend the world rankings. I have not felt this drawn to a video game in many, many years.
Monday, May 26, 2008
Memorable Memorial Day
Michelle was dubious of it all but consented, if only because Jared was so excited.
By 8:30 last night, Jared was begging me to go to bed. While in bed, it took him close to 40 minutes to settle in. He kept tossing and turning, sitting up and chattering, always wondering how he would know when it was 5 a.m. He did eventually settle in, though.
When the appointed hour arrived, I was up at 4 a.m., though feeling far less enthusiastic than the night before. After I did a number of things, including exercise, Jared was up with me by 5:30 a.m., and we were playing Super Smash Bros. Brawl.
I made a 7:30 a.m. trip to Ralphs to scout out orange juice while Jared played Mario Kart. At Ralphs, I happened upon a cookie sale on the day old rack that seemed near irresistible. I came away with 2 dozen chocolate chip pecan, and 2 dozen oatmeal raisin walnut cookies for $3.16. I almost took home a dozen glazed donuts, too, (also for .89), but I was still smarting from last Saturday's donut debacle. I would've patted myself on the back for the exercise of restraint, if my hands weren't already full with the 4 boxes of cookies.
We then came home near 2 p.m. and cleaned up, before ultimately resuming our gaming activities.
For the evening, we opted for some less traditional fare: grilled pizza, and, of course, cookies.
Jared is now sleeping pleasantly in his own bed, but not before pleading to be able to do it all over again tomorrow, or at the very least this Saturday.
Middling Reviews of Mediocre Donuts
Weeks ago on an early Saturday morning, I took Emily with me to nearby Rose Donuts.
The donuts were fine, I suppose, though I suspect time has softened my view of them. As we tasted them I remember being entirely unimpressed, though full.
Tasty's Donuts -- Layton, Utah
Back in mid-April, we visited Utah for a few days. One our last day there, I visited a nearby Tasty's donuts to try again one of their "Spudnuts" [glazed donuts made out of potato flour] among others. I felt compelled to make the visit, in part, by a travel channel program on "America's Best Donuts" that had dedicated 10 minutes or so of its 50 minute program to Spudnuts.
Admittedly, the service at Tasty's won me over easily, as a pleasant cashier seemed greatly pleased at the thought that I was there to buy a dozen. [She seemed unimpressed by the fact that I knew their donuts were made with potato flour though]. In addition to the spudnuts, I picked a couple maple and chocolate bars, as well as some buttermilk and purple looking blueberry donuts.
These donuts, though, proved deceitfully appealling. The spudnuts tasted different than a normal glazed donut, but not really better. The frosting on the blueberry donuts and maple bars was crumbly when we bit into them, which would be something I'd expect from donuts off the day old rack. I thought this nearly unforgiveable.
Donut Touch -- Miramar, CA
Last Saturday, the kids and I made a 30 mile round trip to Donut Touch in Miramar. This shop had apparently been ranked a "Reader's Best" back in 2000. Additionally, they had a large window sign promising "San Diego's Best Donuts." Suffice it to say I had high hopes.
I was immediately disappointed by a few things though: (1) Despite the window sign, I again found that over half the display was taken up by the plain cake/chocolate variations I saw at Rose Donuts [and that I've seen in just about every San Diego donut shop I've been to]; (2) the price for a dozen donuts was an outrageous $8.99 [$2 more than a Rose Donuts dozen and $2 more than I can get two dozen Krispy Kremes for -- with my buy one get one free card]; and (3) There were only three or four donuts on display that seemed worth my time.
Again, out of habit and because my eyes were bigger than my stomach, we still got a dozen. We took them home expectantly, but found most of the donuts tasted like exactly like the donuts we'd tried at Rose Donuts. Only the old fashioned donut seemed worth a second taste with a delightfully crispy exterior. At $8.99 a dozen, though, and probably a gallon of gasoline (at $4), this was hardly something to be excited about.
Indeed, in the end, "San Diego's Best Donuts" compelled me to do something I've never done before: throw away the excess donuts. I also vowed to never again buy an entire dozen -- that is, if I'm just buying donuts for the four of us. I think 1/2 dozen would just as easily meet our needs.
* I submit that when you see a display like this, there's a 90% chance you're in for an inferior donut regardless which donuts you end up selecting.
** A few weeks later Jared, Emily, and I returned [it was within walking distance] and each selected one donut. At that time, I got Michelle a buttermilk donut, which turned out to be just about as average as the rest of their donuts.
Saturday, May 10, 2008
A First
And you thought you had nothing to be grateful for.
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Nice Milkshakes Finish Last
The Ninth Annual Clark Family Milkshake Making Contest went down Saturday night and I'll be heading home without the trophy. This despite an innovative, handmixed Oatmeal Cookie milkshake [vanilla ice cream, milk, cinnammon, brown sugar, and oatmeal cookie chunks] that the one of the judges noted was her "favorite." This same judge -- who will remain nameless -- in the same breath marked me down on appearance since a bit of milkshake had apparently spilled over the edge of the cup. She also took issue with the size of the oatmeal cookie chunks: in her mind they were too big.
So I took home a disappointing third place -- actually, I tied for third place with my sister Sarah's Strawberry Citrus milkshake [the other judge's favorite -- yet puzzlingly, neither of us won]. That meant a bag circus peanuts as the prize. Sarah got some rainbow twizzlers.
Melissa won for the second time in three years (twice in a row with a one year stint as judge) with a workmanlike rootbeer milkshake. The secret, according to Melissa and the judges, was her use of rootbeer extract -- since apparently just adding rootbeer doesn't offer enough rootbeer flavor for a milkshake consistency. Alas, she didn't make enough of it for anyone else to get to taste any of it.
Second place went to Nichole's Banana Split with a Twist milkshake (the twist being mini-peanut butter balls). Peter -- with his S'mores milkshake, garnered the most creative award. This despite telling everyone prior to the award ceremony that it was the worst shake he'd ever made (which, from Peter, is saying something).
Mom's Lime Dream milkshake finished fourth.
Those milkshakes not placing included Alisha's blueberry cheesecake milkshake, Dad's island surprise (the banana flavor overpowered the mango), Matt's Berry Me (a haphazard berry concoction with Golden Grahams as the secret ingredient), Leslie's Berry White (raspberries and white chocolate), and Jared's first ever entry -- chocolate chocolate (a chocolate cake with Hersey bar).
The judges claimed this was the best year ever for shakes -- alas, it doesn't seem to have been the best year for judges.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
It's Milkshake Time
As the rules stand now, the 1st place winner, and the "Most Creative" recipient are judges for the following year (or, if that ends up being the same person, then 1st and 2nd place). There's an ever evolving list of criteria for scoring, usually centering around a few key categories: taste, appearance, thickness, and originality. The milkshakes are judged blindly, with the judges both scoring them and offering a few lines of sometimes merciless written feedback.
The latest controversies stemming from last year's competition: (1) Does a milkshake have to have milk in it, or can people simply stir up ice cream?; and (2) Do we require blender use of all participants, or can people elect to hand mix their shakes? The statutes and case law are unclear.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Easter Aftermath
Tonight I took Jared with me a to a few stores, under the pretense of needing a few "groceries" and other sundry items. The stores: Longs Drugs, Ralph's, and Target.
There's a little bit of an art to scavenging post-holiday candy. Generally, in the days immediately following a holiday, stores discount their holiday merchandise (and candy) 50%. As evidenced tonight, at stores like Ralph's and Long's Drugs this hardly amounts to a discount at all -- since 50% the regular price at these stores amuonts to a negligible discount over the sale price before the holiday.** Target's "regular" prices are usually more reasonable, making a 50% discount a bit more attractive.
The trick to scavenging, though, isn't the 50% discount -- it's finding the right candy at the 75% discount. The 75% discount is elusive and usually only shows up after the store is frustrated with its inventory and wants to move it now. When a store does reach that point -- and it's hard to know when a particular store will reach it -- sometimes there's still quality candy left, and sometime there's not. That's what makes calculating the risk/reward of post-holiday candy pricing so challenging.Obviously this is why timing is key and inevitably seems to require a bit of luck. Ideally you'll visit the store within the first few hours of the change from 50-75%, and certainly within the first 24 hours. After that, any candy left is likely to be the kind you probably wouldn't want even if it was free.
But happening upon a store at the right time in the days follow a holiday can be the stuff of legends -- and some of my posts have borne that out.
As for Jared and I tonight, we weren't in a gambling mood. We settled for some Reese's Peanut Butter Eggs from Target -- still at the 50% discounted price.
Monday, March 17, 2008
Breaking Down the Entennman's Glazed "Popems"
My experience with Entenmann's was in Boston. One desperate evening (before the nearby Dunkin' Donuts opened), I opted to buy a crumb cake of theirs from a nearby CVS. Despite the low expecations, the crumb cake still managed to underwhelm me with a distracting aftertaste.
These donuts fared better.
They're cake donuts, as the preservative types of donuts normally here. This means they're a little heavier, since the donut holes offered by most shops will be yeast raised, and thus lighter. This isn't necessarily bad.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
World's Greatest Hamburgers? Not Today.
I liked the atmosphere at Fuddruckers, though I could've done without the 80's music and the alcohol as part of a value meal. I also could've done without the near $7 for a signature burger. That's nearly double the cost of a Double-Double -- though it does promise to be a 1/2 lb. burger. I tried the 1/2 lb. Bacon Cheddar burger today, since it was dubbed a "Fudd Fav."
Fuddruckers takes a little different approach to burgers: they have a condiment bar complete with lettuce, tomatoes, pickles, and all other condiments you might reasonably put on your burger. Hence, apart from the patty, cheese, (and in my case, bacon), it's all up to you.
On the surface this sounds ideal -- you literally build your own burger. Let me suggest, though, that Fuddruckers here abdicates its responsibility, and leaves it to you to determine what precise combination of sauce, lettuce, tomato, pickles, etc., makes for the "World's Best Hamburger." The customer is thus left to decide, and, not being familiar with the specific ingredients and their interplay with the specific quality of beef, bun, and cheese, is left to guess and experiment. This, to me, falls far short of the ideal.
I say, "Give me your best shot, and I'll tell you what I want you to leave out." They seem to be saying "We don't know what to put on it, so you figure it out."
The bun appeared to have been toasted -- perhaps even slathered with butter before toasting. Not a bad call. The patty was thick and there were two nice pieces of bacon on top of some melted cheddar. (Actually, maybe the butter wasn't such a good idea.) I opted to top it with some lettuce, tomato, and pickles.
It also came with some potato wedges, which sounded more appealing than regular fries. I quickly realized, though, that the oven fries Michelle (or even I) make at home are far superior.
About 2/3 of the way through my burger, I realized I couldn't remember having eaten the first 2/3. That's how unremarkable it was. Decent? Yes, but completely unmemorable. At near $7, that's inexcusable**--especially in Southern California where In-N-Out is so prevalent.
They did give me a computer mouse pad just before I left. That was nice. I couldn't help but wonder if they might have better saved the money on the mouse pads and spent a little more time building their self-proclaimed "World's Greatest Hamburgers."
On the way back to the office, I shared a portion of these musings with the friend who'd recommended the place. He was a bit taken aback, perhaps mistaking my criticism of the burger as an affront to his lunchtime company. He mused that he'd never heard someone go on so much about a hamburger, and then observed that, when he goes out to lunch, the food is at best a secondary or tertiary concern, taking a backdrop to the good company and conversation attendant to the meal.
Indeed, if he's left to frequent places like Fuddruckers, the food doesn't leave him much of a choice, does it?
* The friend who'd seemed to have highly recommended Fuddruckers later backed off his comments and noted only that the burgers were "decent."
** This is to say nothing of the waitress they send around. You order the food at the register, like any other fast food joint. You then pick up the food yourself, get your own beverage and condiments, but then they strangely send around a waitress to tell us she's going to be our server and to let her know if we "need anything." She then stops by every five minutes to ask "Is everything ok?", which apparently means we're now obliged to tip her. I'm against this.
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Whither the Double Stuf?
We got them home, put the rest of the groceries away, and then ate a few -- with milk.
Didn't Oreos used to taste better?
I used to be enamored with the filling and the chocolate cookie -- often eating the whole package before feeling the need to slow down. Not recently, as I ate more cookies out of the hope that they'd taste better and not because they did.
Perhaps I've simply too long spent my strength on riotous eating.
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Fall From Grace?
My travels home from Columbia, SC yesterday unexpectedly took me through the Cincinnati airport. In my race through the terminal, I’d fixed myself in a determination to pass up the standard airport fare -- thereby saving my government per diem for more, umm…err…worthy endeavors.
I had not expected, though, to cross paths with a Dunkin Donuts stand. I did.
It had been nearly three years.* I was feeling nostalgic. After all, several of my top 21 pastry experiences of my top pastry experiences of all time involved Dunkin Donuts. Without any hesitation, instinctively even, I made my way to the stand.
Now, if this blog has borne out anything, surely it has shown me to be a man who appreciates donuts.
Not these donuts, though.
As I approached the donut stand, I was immediately disappointmented at the meager and substandard donut fare offered. The selection was limited, but, what’s more, the donuts looked uninviting and old, shriveled and stale. They had very little frosting where it ought to have been abundant. There weren’t even any glazed! Instead, there were peddling several variations of the plain cake donut, offered in a smattering of different frosting colors and sometimes a few sprinkles. [Few donuts have ever been less appealing than the Dunkin’ Donuts plain cake donut – even at its best.]
I surveyed the cart for a few minutes somewhat incredulously, because, as much as I missed Dunkin Donuts and as dedicated as I am to the donut cause, I started to think there wasn’t anything worth buying. [Perhaps only those loyal readers will sense the import of that statement.] Ultimately, I found a lightly frosted chocolate cake donut that I thought I remembered being decent. It seemed to be the least offensive of the bunch. I bought two, paying an outrageous 89 cents a piece. Tucking the bag under my arm, I made my way to the terminal.
The chocolate cake donut, though, was far inferior to the donut I remembered. [It didn't help that not two weeks before I'd enjoyed Krispy Kreme's devil's food cake donut (very underrated).] Where the donut was supposed to be of the heavier cake variety, it had the form and appearance of a cake donut, but lacked substance.
I started to wonder if I hadn’t been mistaken -- Was there ever cause to like Dunkin Donuts? Was this stand simply an appaling aberration, or had my donut palate so evolved that I'm not simply above the Dunkin Donut? "Impossible," I thought, since, even ignoring the price I paid, I I probably would've preferred the Hostess waxy, mini chocolate frosted donuts available at any grocery store.
Whatever the answer, I've now found -- ironically in what I thought to be a trusted brand -- that there are donuts that are not worth my time and appetite.
* Prior to yesterday, I hadn't had a Dunkin Donut since our days in Cambridge, MA.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Five Guys
This evening finds me in Columbia, South Carolina. Among my first order of business here was tonight's trip to a nearby Five Guys. I had intended to make the trip with a friend, but when others got I were supposed to make the trek downtown by ourselves, though somehow we ended up with a group of eight accompanying us. This made me uncomfortable, since I was headed to Five Guys to try the burgers, while the rest followed along on the thought that I was recommending it.
Gratefully, though, I have high praise for Five Guys.
Five Guys offers two sizes of burgers: regular (two patties) and small (one patty). Their burger options include the chance to add bacon to a burger or cheeseburger. The decisions don't end there.
After ordering a cheeseburger, they asked "What do you want on it?" [I wasn't ready for this, nor for the long list of potential toppings to choose from. I went with what I know: Absolutely no mayonaisse, tomatoes, pickles, and lettuce.* I then waited, eating a few peanuts** while they filled my order.
The burger was good. Very good. [The fries were very average.] The interplay between the patties and cheese actually reminded me a great deal of the In-N-Out Double-Double; in fact, I'd be hard pressed to distinguish them.
Again, the burger was very good. BUT, I missed the special sauce In-N-Out puts on its burgers. Perhaps the tomatoes weren't as crisp. And...the meal cost nearly $2 more than a comparable In-N-Out meal. Shouldn't that mean the burger was supposed to be 25% better?
Bottom line: Very good burgers. I'll be back. Given a choice between Five Guys and In-N-Out, though, my taste buds and my wallett opt for In-N-Out.
* Perhaps, given more chance to process the potential toppings next time, my next Five Guys burger will taste even better.
** The floor was so clean, thouh, that I felt awkward about droping the peanut shells on the floor. I did it anyway.
Saturday, February 09, 2008
Heavenly Donuts
I took in a sampling of their most tantalizing donuts -- and then a sprinkled covered, chocolate donut for Jared. The cinammon crumb donut tasted inferior to most any other I've tried -- the "crumb" was sloppily applied and too sparse. Michelle described them as "bread crumb...with cinammon." The cake itself showed some promise, though.
The glazed donut tasted only slightly better than what I might've gotten at Albertson's -- which is to say it was perfectly adequate.
The frosting on the maple bar crumbled when I cut it up -- meaning I had to reattach it after it fell off. That's unforgiveable.
I've long thought I was looking for San Diego's best donuts -- I am. It occurred to me today, though, that I seem at least as interested in tasting all of San Diego's donuts. Hence, even my trip to Heavenly Donuts had some redeeming value -- though I won't be returning.
* I went to our stake center this morning because they were showing the broadcast an hour earlier than at our new stake center.
Friday, February 08, 2008
New Digs, Extreme Pizza
So last night we surveyed the chaos of our home, gauged our energy for the evening, and decided to try Extreme Pizza. Their pizza apparently garnered honors as being San Diego's best pizza in 2006.**
Alas, this does not bode well for the San Diego pizza situation.
We ordered a large 14" Green With Envy (pesto sauce, tomatoes, feta, fresh basil, oregano, and mozzarella), and a large 14" Railroad Grade (italian sausage, pepperoni, fresh mushrooms, red onions, fresh tomato sauce, mozzarella, and cheddar). They certainly sounded delectable.
With a "Buy one Get one Free" coupon, we paid $21.47 or so.
They certainly looked like the gourmet pizzas they purport to be. It even tasted pretty good, though on the third and fourth pieces I felt like I was forcing myself to be pleased with it. (Jared & Emily turned up their noses almost immediately).
Of course, to say a pizza tastes "pretty good" isn't saying much. All pizza tastes "pretty good," but not all pizzas cost $20 a pop. Indeed, all in all I found the pizza just a bit more serviceable than Domino's $6 1-topping medium pizzas (which seem to be roughly the same size). And maybe that's even a stretch, since I'm always to finish off a Domino's medium pizza. I can't say the same about last night's fare.
I'm just glad we had a coupon.
* We're also only two blocks away from a donut shop I'm anxious to try.
** At least according to their coupon. Who knows, though, maybe they decided to rank themselves number #1.
Friday, February 01, 2008
Ugh, Moving
It will be move #9 since we've been married. With all that experience, one might think moving would get easier. It hasn't.
Still, a few guiding principles have emerged:
(1) Make it short: If you ask someone help you load a moving truck at 9 a.m., that doesn't mean you start packing at 9 a.m. If the world could but learn this one principle....I promised some folks at church last Sunday that we'd have the truck loaded in about an hour.
(2) Have food: I told these same folks there'd be plenty of donuts if they helped. Earlier this evening, we stopped by Krispy Kreme and picked up 4 dozen donuts for the morning.* Most of them will still be around tomorrow morning.
I suspect, if I could deliver on those two promises, even you might want to help.
*I only had to pay for two dozen, given my lovely "Buy one dozen, get one dozen free" card. It's good for another five free dozen. Want some?
Thursday, January 31, 2008
The Passing of a Prophet
Two weeks or so ago he spoke at a regional broadcast for our area. He looked older than I'd ever seen him. He spoke slowly, and it seemed as though it took all of his energy to do so.
Still, his health didn't seem to affect his ability to give good counsel. He spoke plainly on strengthening marriage, speaking as well as I've ever heard anyone speak on the subject. He mentioned the need to cultivate mutual respect with one's spouse. He said we should stop trying to "remake" our spouse, and noted that he was "offended by the sophistry that LDS women are only to be barefoot and pregnant." Decisions as to when to have kids and how many are between a couple and the Lord.
He also talked of learning to "cultivate the art of the soft answer," noting that "quiet talk is the language of love, of peace, of God" and that ours, like the voice of Heaven, should be a still, small voice.
Of course, at the time, I didn't realize it would be the last time I would hear him speak. I take comfort, though, in the fact that, even if I had known, I could not have paid any closer attention than I did, or taken any better notes.
Oh, I will miss you President Hinckley. I will miss your pragmatism, your media savvy, and your self-depricating humor. I know that you were and are a prophet of God, and I have tried with all my heart to follow your counsel. I add my voice to the millions who lament your passing, and who hope to someday to be worthy of the happiness and sweet reunion you now enjoy.
Sunday, January 27, 2008
The $100 Dilemma
It turns out we've got about 11,000 points, which means we've got just more than enough to get a $100 gift card to a number of different places: Circuit City, Target, Pottery Barn, Bed Bath & Beyond, JC Penney, Sears, and a number of different restaurants (to name a few).
Herein lies our dilemma.
Do we get a practicle gift card? One that'll replace income we otherwise might've spent in one of our budget categories -- like clothing or household items -- thus improving our circumstances by $100? Or do we follow our hearts and just get a $100 gift card to Ruth's Chris Steakhouse?
We're both inclined to get the Ruth's Chris card. Fantastic, insanely expensive steak, that we'd all but given up hope of ever tasting again.
And yet...the pull to be practicle keeps giving us pause. We're careful enough in monitoring our monthly budget that we'd notice the impact if we went the practicle route. We'd never spend "real" money eating out at Ruth's Chris -- so score 1 for getting the card -- and yet the possibilities here seem close enough to real money to make us feel some sense of obligation to treat it as such -- score one for the budget (sigh). Furthermore, Clark family rule #15 firmly states: never eat at Ruth's Chris unless someone else is paying.
So, please, for the sake of the happiness of our tastebuds, give me your best reasons we should get the Ruth's Chris card anyway.
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Ringing In The New Year
Not only is it dark, cold,* and a year 'til Christmas, January also happens to follow the most gluttonous month of the year [and rightly so].
This inevitably means -- if resolutions are to be kept -- a difficult month of sugar withdrawals.
It's been a miserable five days.
*Well, relatively cold -- you can rest assured I haven't forgotten I live in San Diego.